A method or an approach?

 

I and the colleagues I work most closely with don't consider Suggestopedia as a *method*, but rather an *approach*, and based on an *attitude*: the difference isn't just pedantic - we've all seen plenty of people who follow slavishly what Lozanov describes, and Gateva used to practice, step by step, and because of their basic attitudes still produce a tense situation in which no constructive learning takes place: and we've seen plenty of people who have no training and no theory but still intuitively do everything which produces the magic in which people want to learn and so they do - because they had the 'right' attitude to their fellow-humans, and used the 'right' approach in their sessions ...

 

And here 'right' means 'one which will lead to releasing the learner's potential to learn...'

 


start | psycholinguist | the record | an alternative | Lozanov | original paper | memorizing | they can not use it | different from suggestopedia | method | emotions | languages | exchange | come to China