Suggestopedia
is many things to many people.
Dr. Lozanov is just about the only person who makes
any hard-and-fast lines of distinction between what
*is* suggestopedia (that's what he does) and
what *isn't* suggestopedia (that's what anyone
else does :-) ).
But
it must be evident that anything which aims to be
'wholistic', or 'whole-person' education, must be
eclectic, and use everything which might work. Lozanov
is critical of people who try out thing s which he
hasn't himself first tried and tested and approved,
for fear of them causing psychological damage, and
doing it in his name: and of course one can understand
and sympathise with that...
At
the same time, what is the alternative? A colossal
amount of psychological damage is being done all the
time by teachers who aren't aware of the effect of
what they say and do, and those who have an inner
need to misuse their power: so *any* thoughtful
and sensitive attempt to improve on that by monitoring
what goes on in the learners and being sensitive to
feedback (expressed and observed) must be better than
that. Lozanov can't teach everyone who wants to learn,
and in the end each teacher stands there with their
own learners and makes their own judgements about
what to do from one moment to the next. A method can
be good; a methodology still better; best of all is
a constructive attitude and a human awareness coupled
with an imaginative resourcefulness.
There
are people with skills in fields which Lozanov never
had a chance to expereince in his Bulgarian isolation;
and, as I said before, even at the technical level
of which music to used for the suggestopedic first
concert reading, there is repertoire which he never
even had a chance to hear, never mind test...
When
I work with suggestopedic teacher-training, I say
that 90% of what I do is Suggestopedia, and I use
about 90% of Suggestopedia in what I do: but I trust
that *everything* I do is suggestopedic - i.e.
aimed at the enhancement of learning and aware of
the power and effect of suggestion...