Do
you know him, or have you perhaps experienced his
own sessions? We could have a very long and involved
discussion about the doctor and his work: maybe
if and when we meet...
He
has his fans, and he has his detractors. My attitude
is two-fold...
On
the positive side: I respect him as a historical
figure, as someone who helped get the learning revolution
under way; he was the first person to see the value
of a regularly-repeating cycle, and the two concert-readings
in Suggestopedia have enormous value, both for learning
and for general healing.
But
there are other aspects.
His
work is claimed as scientific, and as being based
on thorough research: but I believe the scholarly
world is agreed that it doesn't meet up to accepted
standards of depth, objectivity, and demonstrability.
This doesn't make the work invalid in itself - it
has had great value as stimulus and inspiration:
but it means that we may be skeptical when the unspecified
'results' are claimed as authoritative, and as the
only truth.
To
take one example, their 'tests' of the way different
kinds of music work, appear to be based on a small
and unrepresentative sample of the global 'population'.
I'm specially conscious of this, since my own research
- reveals
how and why European classical and pre-classical
music works with European languages
- shows
a great vista of possible repertoire Lozanov and
Gateva couldn't know of
- gives
an understanding which makes working with music
in foreign-language teaching simpler and more
effective
- shows
where more investigation is needed (culturally,
historically, geographically - I can write more
if you're interested, of course)
Drs.
Lozanov and Gateva showed us what was possible in
the spirit of the Eastern Europe of the 1950's:
but when applied in the West today ,this produces
a hierarchical human dynamic and an authoritarian
atmosphere and which many people find dissonant
with the expressed aims of empowering the whole
person.
We
can say that Lozanov and Gateva were pioneers: but
they don't have the last word. Life goes on: and
fortunately we can build on their foundation and
integrate it with what others have shown is possible
since then and in other cultures: and then we can
make our own discoveries of yet more new possibilities...
From
Lynn Dorrity, for example, I learned an approach
which took Lozanov's work as its starting point:
but which in its effect is the antithesis of Lozanov's
ambience: the experience of each individual learner
is the authentic material we work with: and the
almost tangible level of satisfaction and harmony
which people exhibit as they come out of his workshops
tells its own story...
It's
an exciting world, an open world, a constantly developing
world!!!